The Razor's Edge of "Good": A Framework for Clarity

Forget subjective opinions. This post introduces the "Intent-Impact Razor," a stark framework defining "good" in design and product as measurable impact aligned with clear intent.

PRODUCT DESIGN

10/11/20244 min read

In the often-murky waters of design and product development, the elusive concept of "good" can feel like chasing a phantom – a bit like Captain Ahab and that elusive white whale, always just out of reach. We talk about user-centricity, business value, and delightful experiences, but the actual definition of "good" often remains frustratingly subjective, leading to endless debates and wasted cycles. It's time for a stark, almost brutal clarity.

Forget the fluffy adjectives and the endless stakeholder opinions. "Good" boils down to one core principle: Measurable Impact Aligned with Intent.

That's it. No more, no less.

This framework, which I call the Intent-Impact Razor, forces us to cut through the noise and focus on what truly matters. It demands a rigorous two-pronged approach:

Prong 1: Crystalizing Intent – What Are We Actually Trying to Achieve?

Before a single pixel is pushed or a line of code is written, we must ruthlessly define the intended outcome. This isn't a vague aspiration; it's a specific, measurable objective rooted in either user needs or business goals (and ideally, the intersection of both). Think of it like setting the destination on your GPS – without a clear address, you're just driving around aimlessly.

  • User Intent: What specific problem are we solving for the user? What tangible benefit will they derive? How will their behavior demonstrably change? "Improved user experience" is not intent. "Reduce task completion time by 15%" or "Increase successful onboarding rate by 10%" is closer, but still needs deeper context. Why do we want to reduce task completion time? Why is a higher onboarding rate crucial for the user?

  • Business Intent: What specific business metric are we aiming to influence? How will this product or feature contribute to revenue, retention, efficiency, or brand perception in a quantifiable way? "Increase engagement" is not intent. "Increase monthly active users by 5%" or "Reduce customer support tickets related to X feature by 20%" provides a clear target. Why is increased MAU important? Why do we need to reduce those specific support tickets?

The key here is unambiguous definition. If we can't articulate the "why" and the "what" in a way that can be measured, then we're building on shaky ground. This stage demands tough questions and a willingness to push back against vague pronouncements – no room for "I have a feeling it'll be good."

Prong 2: Rigorous Impact Measurement – How Will We Know If We've Succeeded?

Once the intent is crystal clear, we must define how we will measure its realization. This requires identifying key metrics and establishing baseline data. Without a clear mechanism for measuring impact, "good" remains an opinion, not a fact. It's like trying to win a race without a finish line – you might run fast, but you'll never know if you actually won.

  • User Impact Metrics: These directly reflect the change in user behavior or experience tied to our intent. Examples include task completion rates, time on task, conversion rates, error rates, satisfaction scores (measured through specific surveys related to the intended outcome), feature adoption rates, and frequency of use.

  • Business Impact Metrics: These directly link the product or feature to tangible business outcomes. Examples include revenue generated, churn rate, customer lifetime value, operational efficiency gains, cost savings, and brand sentiment (measured through specific tracking related to the product or feature).

The crucial element here is direct correlation. We need to be able to confidently attribute changes in these metrics to the product or feature we've designed and built. This often requires careful experimentation, A/B testing, and robust analytics.

The Razor's Edge in Action:

Consider a team designing a new checkout flow for an e-commerce site.

  • Vague "Good": "We want a better, more user-friendly checkout."

  • Intent-Impact Razor:

    • Intent: To reduce cart abandonment rate by 5% (Business Intent) by simplifying the guest checkout process to three steps (User Intent - making it faster and less cumbersome).

    • Impact Measurement: Track cart abandonment rate before and after the new flow launch, specifically segmenting guest checkout users. Monitor time spent on the checkout page and drop-off points at each step.

If, after a defined period, the cart abandonment rate for guest users hasn't decreased by 5%, then the new checkout, regardless of how aesthetically pleasing or intuitively designed it might seem, has not achieved its core definition of "good." It might look like the Millennium Falcon, but if it doesn't make the Kessel Run in less than twelve parsecs (our 5% reduction), it hasn't delivered on its core function.

The Stark Truth:

This framework can feel harsh because it forces accountability. It removes the comfort of subjective praise and demands tangible results. Designs that win awards but don't move the needle on defined intent are, by this definition, not "good." Features that are lauded by stakeholders but don't demonstrably improve the user experience or contribute to business goals are, simply put, not "good."

Beyond the Razor:

While the Intent-Impact Razor provides a crucial foundation, it doesn't negate the importance of craft, aesthetics, and ethical considerations. These are vital ingredients that contribute to the potential for impact. A beautifully designed but unusable feature will have zero positive impact. An ethically dubious feature might achieve short-term business goals but have devastating long-term consequences. Think of it like building a delicious meal – you need quality ingredients, but the ultimate judgment is in the taste and its ability to nourish.

However, these elements are secondary to the core principle. They are means to an end, and that end must always be measurable impact aligned with clearly defined intent.

By embracing this stark perspective, we can move beyond the endless debates about taste and opinion and ground our discussions in data and demonstrable outcomes. "Good" ceases to be a feeling and becomes a verifiable reality. It's a sharper, more demanding definition, but ultimately, it's the only one that truly serves our users and our businesses.